• 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh noes! The villain wants to destroy everything the hero holds dear. Whatever will he do!

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      We will assemble a group of unlikely heros and at the very last moment when it looks like all is lost a new hope will appear.

      • June@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that new hope?

        Wonder Woman. But she’ll only have one line and be on screen for 18 seconds wherein a boner joke will be made.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of the action scenes look like a video game cutscene, and these are the cherry picked trailer shots. Are we going to get another Flash?

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw the first one on an airplane. Figured I could either stare at the back of the seat or finally watch it. I should have chosen the seat.

    • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you assuming this is a flop? The first one is one of the highest grossing movies ever.

      • nonearther@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wonder Woman also did amazing numbers before WW84 made the lowest opener for DC

        Since the first movie, there’s no trust left in DC, the DCEU is already r making this movie a zombie, and WB hasn’t yet learnt from Ezra fiasco sheen they decided to persist with Amber.

        The only real question is if this will be buffet flop then The Flash or The Blue Beetle?

        • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          IMO, the difference here is that this isn’t reliant on just the superhero crowd. People who loved James Wan and fast and furious movies showed up for Aquaman and I feel like they will again. The flash and blue beetle had way more of an uphill to climb being basically unknown outside of a cw show and the Snyder movies and there’s a big difference between what Ezra and Amber did. One went on a hugely publicized crime spree essentially and one got into a domestic incident that most people didn’t really care that much about outside of entertainment news spheres.

          James Wan also has a lot more clout to throw around than Patty Jenkins. He also has a much better and proven track record.

          I think this notion that people are checked out on DC or Marvel or superhero movies in general is very exaggerated. People will go to movies if they’re good and hear from their friends said movie was good. As long as the movie matches James Wan’s typical quality level I think this will not be a flop.

          • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            People will go to movies if they’re good and hear from their friends said movie was good.

            Yeah, I don’t know. I hear Blue Beetle is good and I have zero interest in seeing it. I was also told by friends I trust that the Flash movie was fun and interesting and I can’t be bothered to watch it.

            I’m not saying I don’t want to see any superhero movie anymore, but I don’t know that just “good” is good enough anymore. Even so-called “good” superhero movies these days just seem to invariably devolve into forgettable CGI mush.

            Anecdotal, I know.

            • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The Flash is an awful movie. I watched it this past weekend and I couldn’t believe how generic it was. The whole movie is cameos and fan service with no payoff. It’s as if the movie exists just so that the producers can say, “Hey remember these old characters you used to love? Here’s a scene with them! Why are they here? I dunno, just pay us money!”

              I usually hate people who criticize CGI just because it wasn’t filmed for real, but the CGI in the Flash is objectively bad. Apparently the VFX team barely had time to get the shots out the door and it shows. At the beginning of the movie, there’s a shot of Ezra Miller eating a candy bar in slow mo and his head looks like an enlarged bobblehead compared to the rest of his body.

              I keep hoping that the guys running DCEU will turn things around, but the Flash broke me like Bane breaking Batman’s back and then threw me down the pit, except I don’t even want to climb back out at this point.

            • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I watched both of those movies and can attest Blue Beetle was not good by movie standards. It was a fun superhero movie but lacked any real depth and largely did not capitalize on blue beetles powers. That’s lazy filmmaking to me and it didn’t really deserve to succeed.

              I’m one of the few people who liked the flash movie but totally cede that it isn’t a traditionally good movie either. Especially if you can’t get past undercooked CGI or don’t have nostalgia for the character’s it uses.

              In both of these cases, I don’t think the majority of people out there were recommending these in mass. I remember when the first Aquaman came out I had my 40-50 year old coworkers and even older family members bringing it up. I think if you can get that demographic interested you’re more likely to succeed. I could see Aquaman 2 driving similar hype with that crowd. Plus, it’s coming out in December which is usually a good time for these type of movies. I’ll eat crow if I this doesn’t happen but I think this one has more potential than any superhero movie released the past couple years.

          • nonearther@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The last hit DC was Shazam and without any controversy and with good director, Shazam 2 was a big flop as well.

            Wan may attract few crowd, but saying people care about DC is outlandish. Even worst MCU movie, Ant-man 3, made more than past 3 DC movies. There is no superhero fatigue, but there’s definitely DC fatigue, especially when it’s already going to be rebooted.

            Btw last Wan movie was a flop, and it was his own genre, horror.

            • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              People absolutely care about DC in general. Batman is still the literal worlds most popular superhero. Superman as a property is more iconic than anyone in the MCU across the entire world. People absolutely have an appetite for DC movies, WB just hasn’t put out the right content as far as a cinematic universe goes. The Batman was also a huge hit and that was very recent.

              I assume you’re talking about malignant which didn’t perform well but has already become a cult classic… many notable horror enthusiasts cited that as their favorite movie of the year when it was released and it’s had an amazing streaming and rental run.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s going to be fighting upstream for sure, audiences appear to be losing interest in yet-another-superhero movie. Jason Momoa has alot of star draw, so I’m not sure if that will even out. There actually hasn’t been much of a media campaign at all for this release, so thats not a great sign, it means the studio isn’t confident and is hedging its bets by not wasting money on media.

      The casting controversy probably will hurt it too, but maybe enough people will be interested in it that it works as advertising and drawing in more people.

      Overall I’d say the expectations are cautious right now

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why does the trailer have a trailer? haha, I’m only here for the controversy around the aquaman’s love interest

    • r2vq@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trailer for a trailer is a pattern that started a few years ago. It’s annoying and I hate it. The worst is when they put those 5 second clips at the beginning of YouTube trailers announcing a trailer is coming up.

  • Mr_Buscemi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was surprised to see Amber Heard in the description. I had thought there was reshoots to cut her out. Must have misheard months ago lol.