The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world · 5 months agoThe Measure of a Man and a Manlemmy.worldimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1208arrow-down16
arrow-up1202arrow-down1imageThe Measure of a Man and a Manlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·5 months agoThe method of transport isn’t destroying the planet, the method of energy generation is destroying the planet. Invent a transporter today, and thousands of coal fired plants would be built tomorrow to power the transporter pads.
minus-squareohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agopshhhh. just transport the pollution elsewhere. problem solved.
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 months agoA transporters just a replicator with a targeting addon. Assuming it can replicate a nuclear reactor but not uranium, we have enough natural uranium to last for 1000s of years. Even if we went back to coal, the end of all industrial manufacturing might make up for the new pollution.
minus-squareBlue_Morpho@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-25 months agoThe energy requirements of replicators are unfathomably gigantic compared to regular industrial manufacturing. It takes 1.6 Trillion MJ of energy to make an 8kg Bicycle. A nuclear reactor generates 1000 MJ/s. That means you would need 50 nuclear reactors to make 1 bicycle a year with a replicator. It’s why the TNG writers claim the Enterprise generates 12.75 exawatts. They did the math.
The method of transport isn’t destroying the planet, the method of energy generation is destroying the planet.
Invent a transporter today, and thousands of coal fired plants would be built tomorrow to power the transporter pads.
pshhhh. just transport the pollution elsewhere. problem solved.
A transporters just a replicator with a targeting addon.
Assuming it can replicate a nuclear reactor but not uranium, we have enough natural uranium to last for 1000s of years.
Even if we went back to coal, the end of all industrial manufacturing might make up for the new pollution.
The energy requirements of replicators are unfathomably gigantic compared to regular industrial manufacturing.
It takes 1.6 Trillion MJ of energy to make an 8kg Bicycle.
A nuclear reactor generates 1000 MJ/s.
That means you would need 50 nuclear reactors to make 1 bicycle a year with a replicator.
It’s why the TNG writers claim the Enterprise generates 12.75 exawatts. They did the math.