• Fewer units, but more home ownership.

    We don’t want to be a nation of renters. It’s not good for society; it’s only good for a minority of individuals.

    And fewer new units? Where are you pulling that from? It just means developers will be building for home owners, not renters. Like they did back in the Good Old Days, when young people could actually realistically consider buying a home someday. You know, re-creating the conditions that the younger generations are always bitching about that boomers had which aren’t available anymore. Back when not all the land was owned by a few giant corporations.

    Fuck renters. Fuck them right in the ear. They can all go eat a dick.

    Disclaimer: I’ve owned every house I’ve lived in since 1998, and even with that collateral, every purchase has gotten harder to find and more expensive. So much of America is owned by property developers, it’s disgusting.

    Fuck. Renters.

    • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You…blame the people who can’t afford to own for renting and also blame that same situation for making it harder for you to buy? You seem to be missing the point here.

      • Noun: renter |ren-tur|

        1. Someone who pays rent to use land or a building or a car that is owned by someone else • the landlord can evict a renter who doesn’t pay the rent = tenant

        2. An owner of property who receives payment for its use by another person

        It’s not my fault the stupid word means both people renting, and the owners who rent the place out. I’d hoped the context would have made it clear to which I was referring, in each use.

        • ruse8145@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lol I’ve never in my life heard a landlord referred to as a renter. It’s a funny situation but I have to say this ones on you :p