fukhueson@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agoExclusive: Bernie Sanders worries young people are underestimating the threat from Trumpwww.usatoday.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down11
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkExclusive: Bernie Sanders worries young people are underestimating the threat from Trumpwww.usatoday.comfukhueson@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 6 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·6 months ago Republicans count on people like that to win. Republicans have lost more than one Senate seat because they ran zealous nutbag losers in safe elections and pissed off moderates. I’m not sure why Democrats get to run pro-war Zionists and Blue Lives fascists, free from the fear that they’ll suffer the same fate.
minus-squareHighElfMage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoBecause unfortunately the pro-Israel, pro- cop Democratic candidates are much closer to the average voter than the nutbag religious extremists are.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·6 months agoIf that’s true, why do more Republicans hold office at the national, state, and local levels?
minus-squareHighElfMage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoGerrymandering, structural advantages, etc. the same as it’s always been.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·6 months agoThis sounds like the strategy Republicans are banking on to win.
Republicans have lost more than one Senate seat because they ran zealous nutbag losers in safe elections and pissed off moderates.
I’m not sure why Democrats get to run pro-war Zionists and Blue Lives fascists, free from the fear that they’ll suffer the same fate.
Because unfortunately the pro-Israel, pro- cop Democratic candidates are much closer to the average voter than the nutbag religious extremists are.
If that’s true, why do more Republicans hold office at the national, state, and local levels?
Gerrymandering, structural advantages, etc. the same as it’s always been.
This sounds like the strategy Republicans are banking on to win.