Hi there, I’m looking at floating window mangers as an in-between of DEs and escaping configuration hell (somewhat) of tiling Window Managers.

Specifically, I was looking at IceWM and OpenBox, but would love recommendations and discussion on what you like and why.

Cheers!

    • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure KDE’s window manager, kwin, can do all of those things through kwin scripts and window rules, except the pager doesn’t show the details of windows on other desktops, just the outline.

    • poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was a fun one! Now, I use Gnome, after I discontinued my own fork of catwm called ocelot (but this was a tiling wm based on dwm, anyway).

  • Gryzor@lemmyfly.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Try pop_os. It’s gnome tiling can be enabled and disabled from the top bar and it’s defaults are sane and easy to change.

  • Oka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This stick I use so that my window doesn’t slam closed

  • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    OpenBox & Xfwm. I’m keeping an eye on labwc, which is a new openbox clone for wlroots. It’s already suitable for everyday use.

  • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    For X, I’d probably go for Openbox. For Wayland, I have tried Hikari, but it reminded me why I don’t like floating window managers, so I don’t use it, but it seems really cool! Also, there is labwc which is supposed to be an Openbox replacement for Wayland, but I can’t tell you anything about it cuz I haven’t tried it.

  • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I use glazier, a WM I wrote myself. But given your description, it won’t fit you at all ^^ It’s very bare bones, and requires that you script everything not mouse driven using wmutils.

    • Gilgamesh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about dwm makes it a more appealing choice compared to XMonad? (Excluding the C vs Haskell argument)

      • sederx@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i dont have much experience with xmonad but i tried every wm at some point. usually the things that keep me with dwm is that i found a build with very sane defaults and a number of patches i appreciate like swallowing, fake fullscreen(so you can fullscreen a program inside the assigned window) or xresources/pywal integration . i also love the scratchpad implementation and the tag system with a tag 0. i also like dwmblocks for the status bar . now im sure some of this features are available on other wm but i never found all of them in one like on DWM.

        i also use ST as terminal and it works great with dwm while it gives me issues with other WM(usually resizing issues)

    • Administrator@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      dwm’s so good. It has pretty much everything one would need and once you’ve set it up, no need to change anything.

  • Drito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Xfce one. I don’t see the point of simple WM for floating windows. I use a WM because it is the only solution for a proper tiling window manager.