• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah but for most people who aren’t knowledgeable about history, the connotation isn’t necessarily negative.

          It should be, but it isn’t. “Settlers of Catan” is probably one of the most popular board games ever, and it’s all just friendly people trading sheep and wood and shit.

          • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, because it’s not the settling part of a settler that is harmful. Settling in new lands is a foundational human behavior.

            It’s displacing people when you settle on their already claimed land, and treating yourself as superior that tends to badly violate human rights.

            In the fantasy world of Catan, we don’t genocide the natives to gain territory. This doesn’t make Catan harmful, it makes it a game.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I would argue that settlers is whitewashing colonization since it has all the hallmarks of exploiting a foreign land and shipping the goods abroad but it’s very conveniently unsettled.

              Like how the american frontier was claimed to be unsettled land just waiting to be settled.

          • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            most people who aren’t knowledgeable about history

            sorry but that’s as the kids say a skill issue