• the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not sure how to understand your comment. Currently neither side is winning or loosing. Which is why neither side is willing to give up. The west needs to decide if they want to keep it that way, or give Ukraine enough support so they can finish the job “fast”.

      • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ukraine needs a steady supply of modern weapons and the freedom to use them on Russian territory. That way they can continue dismantling the Russian military and minimize casualties. The Russians are pulling a lot of equipment from storage and are refurbishing it. But those storages won’t last forever. Also, Russia may have a large population (so does Ukraine), but pretty much everybody willing to fight is already fighting. Also economic hardships are only going to increase. In other words, political instability in Russia is increasing and with it Putin’s ability to mobilize troops. Don’t forget, Putin can pull out at any time without loosing his power. For Ukraine it’s about survival.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It seems for every issue in Russia you pose, Ukraine is faring worse-off. Ukraine is grabbing people off the streets, the majority of die-hard loyalists signed up when the war started.

          I don’t see how Ukraine wins by “using modern weapons on Russian Territory.”

          • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, Ukraine faces a lot of the same problems. That’s why it needs international help. The difference is that even if Ukranians don’t want to fight. At least they have a good reason to.

            I’m not saying that victory will be easy. All I’m saying is that it’s very much possible.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I just don’t see a possible victory for Ukraine, at all. Maybe in the past, but at this point it seems like Ukraine should be focused on making their terms of surrender as beneficial to themselves as possible. I don’t see Kursk changing that calculus.

              • blarth@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                I do! I’m very excited to see Ukraine continue to push, hopefully all the way to Moscow! Great job guys.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  What would pushing all the way to Moscow do? Cost more lives? Do you even think it’s remotely possible in the first place? Why?

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  translation: a bloodthirsty psychopath is very excited to see other people die for their entertainment, so many sick fucks on this site

              • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                3 months ago

                Surrender is out of the question for Ukraine. Russia has shown from the first day of the invasion on, that this war is as much a land grab, as it is a punishment for not being Russian enough.

                Russia has been grinding for years now with only miniscule wins, while Ukraine has made some very successful counter offensives. Ukraine simply has the better army. Whether they can win back their territory depends on international support. But even if that fades, I don’t see a scenario in which they just give up. And Russia will only give them an acceptable peace deal if Putin fears for his power or has been removed. This is in part why they launched the Kursk offensive. They need to pressure Putin or continue grinding.

                Also: Holding Russian land is maybe the best bargaining chip they have for future negotiations.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Surrender is out of the question for Ukraine. Russia has shown from the first day of the invasion on, that this war is as much a land grab, as it is a punishment for not being Russian enough.

                  What? From day 1, Russia has made it clear that it wants to grab the contested territories, and demilitarize Ukraine as a consequence of unimpeded NATO expansion. NATO has ignored Russia’s demands and pressed further.

                  Russia has been grinding for years now with only miniscule wins, while Ukraine has made some very successful counter offensives.

                  Slow and steady wins are wins. Ukraine hasn’t managed to turn the tide.

                  Ukraine simply has the better army.

                  With respect to what?

                  Whether they can win back their territory depends on international support. But even if that fades, I don’t see a scenario in which they just give up.

                  You’re saying Ukraine will fight to their last breath? The war is becoming increasingly unpopular as time goes on, do you expect this trend to reverse at some point?

                  And Russia will only give them an acceptable peace deal if Putin fears for his power or has been removed. This is in part why they launched the Kursk offensive. They need to pressure Putin or continue grinding.

                  Acceptable to who? You? Wouldn’t any agreed upon peace-deal be acceptable?

                  Also: Holding Russian land is maybe the best bargaining chip they have for future negotiations.

                  Can they hold it? It seems Kursk is taking away from Ukraine’s ability to hold onto key territory.

                  • the_wise_wolf@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    This is going to be my last message since your last message has made it clear to me that you believe in Russian propaganda and I don’t care debating with you about lies.

                    From day 1, Russia has made it clear that it wants to grab the contested territories, and demilitarize Ukraine as a consequence of unimpeded NATO expansion. NATO has ignored Russia’s demands and pressed further.

                    NATO didn’t press eastwards. It welcomed countries that wanted to join because they felt threatened. And it is obvious now that they were right to be scared. Russia demands a sphere of influence. But this is unacceptable for its neighbors. Russia is a colonial empire that can only think in these terms. That’s why they believe that these countries that want to join NATO don’t have a will of their own and are US puppets. Which makes them fair game. This is not only wrong but also inhumane. It takes away the people’s dignity and their right for peace.

                    And for the love of God. Don’t forget the war crimes committed by Russian soldiers on a systematic and large scale. Mass executions, torture, rape, etc. Those weren’t isolated incidents, they were part of the plan. And Putin himself handed out medals for the commanders of the most notorious units.

                    Slow and steady wins are wins

                    That’s the point. Since the run on Kiev the russians have lost far more territory than they gained.

                    With respect to what?

                    With respect to the Russians. Given the Ukrainian wins, they are clearly doing a better job than the Russians.

                    You’re saying Ukraine will fight to their last breath? The war is becoming increasingly unpopular as time goes on, do you expect this trend to reverse at some point?

                    I’m saying they won’t accept a deal in which Ukraine becomes demilitarized and at Russia’s mercy. And that’s the only deal the Russians are offering right now. Even if they lose the resources to launch offensives, they will dig in and defend as long as they can. And this might go on not for years, but decades.

                    Wouldn’t any agreed upon peace-deal be acceptable?

                    Again, the only deal Russia is willing to give Ukraine at the moment is equal to unconditional surrender. That’s not a peace deal. It’s a farce.

                    Can they hold it? It seems Kursk is taking away from Ukraine’s ability to hold onto key territory.

                    That remains to be seen. It’s also taking away from Russia’s ability to attack in those other regions. Also, this attack shows that Russia has been concentrating its troops on the active front (probably because they felt safe because of western weapon restrictions). Russia was enjoying an asymmetrical advantage. Ukraine took that away.