• capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      In the US, it is. In Canada (assuming this applies to Canada - I don’t know), I don’t know if you want postal workers deciding what is or isn’t hate speech.

      • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        People have the capacity to identify intolerance. We should want them to use that ability when it comes to targeted disinformation campaigns that will ban lifesaving medical care. A ban on gender affirming care will deny trans people the fundamental right to exist. Postal workers should make the strategic decision to defend life and liberty and not spread life-threatening disinformation campaigns.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Would you say the same if someone “strategically” tossed my planned parenthood mail? Or should postal workers just deliver my mail?

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I would say that tossing your planned parenthood mail is a form of intolerance. Which is just as unacceptable as a disinformation campaign to ban planned parenthood in order to deny healthcare and reproductive freedom to individuals.

            People aren’t allowed to shout fire in a crowded movie theater when there is no fire. This basic premise doesn’t change because of the medium of communication. People shouldn’t be allowed to spread dangerous disinformation via the mail.

            We shouldn’t be concerned with what bad faith actors, such as fascists will do, when making our decisions. Bad faith actors will seek to infiltrate and undermine our institutions and systems no matter what we do. Our energy should be spent preventing bad faith actors from infiltrating our institutions.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Under US law, there is absolutely no “hate speech” exception to the 1st amendment. This has been ruled on repeatedly.

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I saw the Grumman LLV mail truck in the thumbnail and just assumed US. I had no idea you guys used them too. Neat!

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          …Which is why I specified US. (Yes, I know where NB is.)

          Most of the people here are arguing from a US perspective, esp. since the original source largely reports on US news, and reports on news from a US perspective.

          • darkpanda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Fun geographical place names time: there’s also a New Brunswick in New Jersey and a New Brunswick in Indiana, and there’s also a New Jersey in New Brunswick and an Indiana in Ontario. There’s also an Ontario in California. But wait, there’s also a California in Ontario. This is where our geographical journey ends for now.