• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      They were attacking commercial vessels. Military has none of those.

      Do you even know what the word “literally” means?

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Terrorists attack commercial ships, US responds to protect them, they attack US ship.

        Yes, literally.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ok, you clearly either don’t or you think commercial and military are distinctions without meaning. Either way, I’m done with your wilfully obtuse ass. Have the year you deserve.

          • Quokka@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Attacks were directed at US Navy ships responding to distress calls from merchant vessels, of which the 157 signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea have an obligation to provide aid to.

            Not to mention SOLAS and UN maritime security obligations.

            But hey, random on the Internet who wants to support brutal authoritarianism knows better than the global community dedicated to helping protect people. Go run off and hide now.