• Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    “Write a bit about yourself to join this server and if we decide you’re too boring we’ll reject your application and say you’re a spammer afterwards”

    Hmm I wonder why normies aren’t flocking to this platforms, what could be stopping them, couldn’t be the shitty onboarding process could it, Nah asking people to apply is the best onboarding process ever (big ass /s)

  • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    29 minutes ago

    If Mastodon wanted to be preferred, it should have been better. I moved to Mastodon over a year ago when the Twitter sale first happened. It was not great then and it’s gotten slightly worse since. I created a Bluesky account two days ago and it already offers exactly the experience I missed from Twitter before Elon.

    Would it be better if Mastodon was good and the federated FOSS option was superior? Sure, absolutely. But, that scenario isn’t even close to the case we are presented with.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      I’ve been a heavy Mastodon user for two years, and I honestly don’t see why so many people on Lemmy give it so much shit. Certainly not in favour of the likes of Bluesky.

      I get WAY more engagement with my posts on there than I ever did on Twitter. And maybe I’m just at an age where I don’t give a shit about celebrity, but I couldn’t care less that all the Big Names have gone to Bluesky and Threads. It’s great not seeing the same people being shared into my TL all the time.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Can you give actual examples?

      I feel the only thing that Mastodon ‘misses’ is some feed to get you addicted.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’ve got a bsky account too but I get way more engagement on my fedi accounts. I’ve been building up my follows for 15 years on the fedi so bsky never had a chance to catch up. it probably never will.

  • daellat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    Its got faults but it’s currently where the big batch of users seems to be going and since some of my interests are pretty narrow that means a lot more to read and see in those interests (or it exists at all). That’s kinda hard to ignore tbh. Its not right wing infested and I’ve already got elon, musk, trump and a bunch of other stuff auto filtered.

  • andrewthe95th@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I feel like you guys are addicted to letting perfect be the enemy of good. Yes, Bluesky being corporate run will probably be an issue down the line, but if it becomes mainstream then people will be used to seeing .APP.INSTANCE and feel more comfortable with the fediverse interface, which I know at least for me was a big hurdle. Like seriously, the fact that the next big thing is federated, even if in name only, is a big step forward.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Expecting perfection is a huge problem in all aspects of life. People just want instant perfection and aren’t willing to work towards it. Then there’s just apathy and that leads to stagnation or worse regression.

    • xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah I’m a huge believer in federated systems but I believe that a lot of ‘normies’ going to bluesky is a huge step in the right direction. Even though most don’t know anything about the tech behind it and migrate because twitter has become a bot infested right wing hell scape, they still are one step closer to being fully integrated to the fediverse.

      • airportline@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Bluesky’s ActivityPub support is also leagues better than Threads because of Bridgy Fed. At least a Bluesky user and a Mastodon user can follow each other and have a back-and-forth conversation.

        • xavier_berthiaume@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah exactly! I’ve even used the bridge yesterday since I’m on Mastodon, and my girlfriend just migrated to bluesky after hearing about the exodus. The process is really easy and only takes a bit of time for some of the DMs to get sent, but otherwise I have no complaints!

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      the irony of a bsky supporter complaining about being judged because it’s not perfect.

  • TehWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Twitter was a vapid load of crap before Elmo took it over. I see this as a win if it knocks him down a peg or 44 billion.

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    I don’t understand what anyone uses twitter, bluesky or mastodon for anymore. I used twitter to follow companies (like CoffeeStain) or YouTubers/Artists.
    Bluesky has some of that, meanwhile mastodon is just a circle pit of yelling and also the same stuff I see on Lemmy.
    I don’t understand what people use it for. There’s no information to follow like company game accounts for games I play, and when I tried to do goofy shitposts like old twitter i got a grand total of 0 likes.

  • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I just looove how ppl believe that switching from one VC-funded centralised corpo platform to another VC-funded (slitghly less) centralised corpo platform is a good thing /s

    Just because it’s (partially) OSS doesn’t make it good. The corp still hold all the power and might sell out, but at least they got free volunteers to program for them so the C-level could get more money!

    (Now don’t tell me that Bluesky is “federated”. They still hold all the power over site rules and moderation. The only little concession you get is that you are allowed to host your own data)

    Apparently virtue signaling about pseudofederation is enough for libs to “get hope for the future of the internet” while they happily lick the boot of yet another centralized “trust me bro this isn’t going to eshittify itself, not this time” corp

  • Donkeytown@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    After initially hesitating, I decided to join Bluesky after having previously tried Mastodon and permanently leaving Twitter. While I was initially reluctant because Jack Dorsey had sold Twitter to Elon Musk, I still created a Bluesky account. I later came across Jason Koebler’s article on 404 Media, which validated my choice. His arguments aligned with my own reasons for preferring Bluesky over Mastodon. Link to the article: The Great Migration to Bluesky Gives Me Hope for the Future of the Internet.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      404 is just mad because we mocked them relentlessly for not using content warnings on their goatse posts.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Pseudo-federated from what people are saying. Something about the user accounts being centralised but the data being decentralised. I don’t understand but it’s something funded by the previous owner of Twitter and full of other corporate money, so I wouldn’t trust it.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        6 hours ago

        there is a critical ‘relay’ component that only they control. so you can setup your own ‘node’, but only connected to their instance.

        only a single instance of the relay exists and they are not releasing that code and a few other pieces. it federates only with itself.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That pretty much sounds centralised. But I guess people don’t care if they don’t have to worry about “picking a server” which is “too complicated” 🤷

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            6 hours ago

            i think the new paradigm of the distributed fediverse is going to take a long time to propagate to the masses. its going to be lots of platforms advertising their corner of the 'verse and the features they permit… but we really need to get the idea of the ‘fediverse’ into their heads that its content accessible by any of those platforms.

            the thing ive noticed is no one cares about ‘sites’ anymore… the kids all want ‘apps’ which is drivin me bonkers. spent decades building mobile-friendly, dynamic viewports only for them to get ignored cuz kids dont want to type in a URL/domain.

            • TWeaK@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 hours ago

              My impression is that it hasn’t been users that have pushed everything into apps, it’s been publishers. This is all a part of a general trend where software has become much less about what it can do for the user, and much more about what data it can extract from a user for the publisher. Websites generally have a lot more protections against such data scraping, meanwhile you can put who knows what code into an app.

            • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 hours ago

              If you look at how RSS fell from use, there were two major issues. On the user side, users had to go out to find content as there wasn’t an inherent way to search for content within the system. On the creator side, creators had to deal with advertising themselves to users and they had to handle the monetization by themselves.

              Social media created the algorithm to find content and developed some revenue sharing with creators.

              If federated media takes off, it will probably look like Threads or Truth Social, where control of a front end monetizes development of the platform.

          • M33@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That’s exactly what people want: no brainer alternative without the fediverse’s fragmentation

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      In theory, yes / kind of.

      In practice, no, not really.

      It uses a different protocol (AT protocol) than the Fediverse ActivityPub protocol, which is what lemmy and mastadon and pixelfed are all built on, so it is not natively interoperable with ActivityPub based Fediverse.

      To do that you have to use bridging software of some kind.

      Also, as others have pointed out… even if you do make the approximate equivalent of your own instance, a PDS… all of these still go through ‘Relays’, which BlueSky controls.

      So… it is technically federated in the sense that it allows for anyone to make their own instance/PDS… but ultimately it is actually totally centralized.

      Instead of a web or weave of many to many connections of independent admins/maintainers, the structure much more resembles a top down hierarchy that is ultimately all controlled by a profit driven corporation.

      If the Relays go down, everything goes down.

      If BlueSky decides they don’t appreciate your instance, they have unitary power to delist or block it, from everyone.

      As compared with the Fediverse, where many different instances and communities can all pick and choose for themselves which other instances and communities they do and do not federate with, and where an outage particular to one community/instance only bricks that particular community/instance.

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean, ATP has only been around for two years, mastodon has been around for 8 years with 6 years of development on AP.

        Development takes time, I feel like “show it to me now or it’s a lie” is a poor take.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The code for their instance isn’t open source, so it’s legitimately impossible to host another relay. So until that changes, yes, it’s a lie

    • solarvector@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Bluesky Social has pledged to transfer the protocol’s development to a standards body such as the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in the near future.[11]

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Let’s see it then. I’m concerned when the opportunity to profit arises that perverse motives will occur.