• 16 Posts
  • 69 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
    • Terrible format for archiving knowledge
    • Terrible tool for retrieving knowledge
    • Locks community access behind a corporate license agreement
    • Hands control of community-created content to a corporation
    • Prevents indexing by web search engines
    • Antithetical to interoperability
    • Privacy-hostile

    A web forum is far better in most cases. If you can’t manage to run your own, there are plenty of lemmy servers that will do it for you. Even an email list (with searchable archives) would be better than Discord.

    If you have collaborative documents that outgrow the forum format, use a wiki.

    If real-time chat is needed, irc or matrix.

    A project hosting its community on Discord is a project that won’t get my contributions.





  • Your current approach of talking raw SMTP is likely to be more hassle than is worthwhile, and since the days of permissive SMTP servers are long gone, might not work at all.

    Since you appear to be using an Debian-based Linux distro, I suggest this approach:

    • If you don’t specifically need exim, consider replacing it with the lightweight dma package (DragonFly Mail Agent): apt install dma
    • Configure dma (or exim) to use your ISP’s SMTP server as a smart host. (Or the Gmail SMTP server if your ISP doesn’t provide one.)
    • Use the /usr/sbin/sendmail command (which comes with dma or exim) to send messages from your scripting language of choice.

    If you prefer to receive messages as SMS, note that most major mobile carriers maintain an email-to-sms gateway for this purpose. Some web searches will probably lead you to the one for your carrier. They usually accept email at an address like 123456789@sms-gateway.example.com





  • ono@lemmy.catoWorld News@lemmy.worldNew Sidebar Rule:
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    if this community has any hope of being anywhere near as comprehensive in coverage as the News Subreddits

    I left Reddit on purpose.

    I would rather have quality than volume.

    I would rather my news feed be diverse than dominated by one or two self-appointed influencers of discourse. (Even if they have good intentions.)

    I approve of this rule. Ten articles per person each day is more than enough at this stage, and the threshold for “too much” can always be adjusted as the community grows.








  • Be the change, homie.

    When someone claims two obviously different things are exactly the same, pointing out that the comparison is idiotic is not combative, homie.

    Edit: More to the point, defending one’s community by pointing out the idiocy of an attack is not combative.

    You might not be paying for software in money but you’re going to pay for it, one way or another.

    Indeed. As I hinted in my comment, and stated more clearly in another one.



  • The difference here is mountains vs. molehills.

    And in most cases, they obviously do have sufficient ability to learn how, because they were able to learn the commercial software they’re currently using.

    As for time, yes, learning always takes time. (Thus my comparison to learning a new commute.) But suggesting that someone learn something new is not stupid or unreasonable, especially if the thing they currently use is not serving them well.

    • In response to that paragraph you added after I replied:

    I don’t know why you would think that cherry-picked and extremely specific scenario is somehow representative of the general subject we’re discussing. Of course situations exist where learning alternative software isn’t the best answer. That doesn’t make it wrong for people to suggest the alternatives. Quite often, they’re perfectly viable, and it’s perfectly reasonable to try to help by making someone aware of them.


  • is exactly like saying “why don’t you just buy a house?” to someone complaining about their landlord.

    What an idiotic comparison.

    Buying a house costs so much money and time that most people cannot afford to, and those who can generally must go into debt for most of their remaining lives in order to do so. Suggesting FOSS to replace “whatever commercial software they use” is the polar opposite, in that it’s literally free (usually in both senses of the word). It’s more like suggesting that someone consider a new route to commute from home to work.

    Also, this opening…

    Okay, all you open source evangelist people: your knee-jerk reaction to come at people

    …is incredibly reductive and combative. The world needs less of that, not more.