• fiercekitten@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m allowed to use it and be critical of it at the same time. But I use it way less these days because adblocker or not, it’s become a user-hostile and censored place and every video is following the same formula in order to get seen the most and the whole thing feels gross.

        • PlantObserver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ya I’m so sick of hearing “can’t mention that, YouTube will demonetize me” on videos (or what amounts to that with censored language, topics, blurred guns now, etc.) Just makes it very clear we’re living in a corporate echo chamber where everything must align with what advertisers want. How about what the viewers want??? Fuck the advertisers

          • kalleboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            How about what the viewers want

            As long as the viewers refuse to pay for content, they get what the customers (the advertisers) want.

            YouTube Premium actually pays out to “demonetized” channels. What people call “demonetized” is actually called “limited ads”.

            • sugartits@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Pardon me Sir/Madam,

              This is Lemmy.

              All everyone does is shit on YouTube because they can no longer easily grab content without paying for it and they expect YouTube to constantly serve them content forever for free because “I’m SuRe GoOgLe CaN aFfOrD iT”

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    From the article…

    But while many think that YouTube’s system isn’t great, Trendacosta also said that she “can’t think of a way to build the match technology” to improve it, because “machines cannot tell context.” Perhaps if YouTube’s matching technology triggered a human review each time, “that might be tenable,” but “they would have to hire so many more people to do it.”

    That’s what it comes down to, right there.

    Google needs to spend money on people, and not just rely on the AI automation, because it’s obviously getting things wrong, its not judging context correctly.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      US Corporations: But we can’t start paying people to do work! That would completely wreck our business model!

      Workers: So you would actually be bankrupt? Your corporation is that much of an empty shell?

      US Corporations: Well, we really just don’t want to have to spend less time golfing, and having to pay people might eventually cut into golf funds and time.