• MrShankles@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s throwing stones in a glass house

    Let’s extrapolate their advice to something they can do, so as not to require bailouts from our tax money. If I have to tighten my budget and be fiscally responsible to survive, so should they.

    You can take it as personal advice all you want, but they aren’t taking any advice because the consequences don’t lead them to homelessness. Instead, their consequences leave us holding the burden

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If I have to tighten my budget and be fiscally responsible to survive, so should they.

      Should, maybe. Doesn’t seem like they do.

      • Pandantic@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, then shouldn’t we demand they do? Or at least criticize them when they don’t? We are criticizing them because they didn’t and then they told us we should.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean by all means. But banks and regular people aren’t really in a comparable position, is what I’m saying. Maybe they should be but it’s just not the situation right now.