I think he will, but there might be a real primary challenge.

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    I’m leaning towards “no”. His fragile ego will have taken two nasty blows in a row. Plus in four years he’ll be even older and more fragile, and it’s already pretty bad.

    If I’m right, I’m sure he’ll endorse some other maga-clown instead.

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      5 个月前

      Considering how many failed businesses he has under his name, I doubt failure is enough to hurt his ego. He’ll just make something up so he can pretend he’s still a success. Like how he claims he won the last election despite it being yet another failure to add to the pile.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 个月前

          Yeah, while the cluster b two axis graph of opinion of self and opinion of others is useful it’s important to remember that narcissism is often rejection of acknowledgment of personal flaws. They don’t actually like themselves

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 个月前

      I don’t think he’ll endorse anyone except maybe for pay. And I don’t think anyone will want his endorsement. Most of his endorsed primary candidates failed (as I recall, valid to double check that). It may not be a mark of death, but it doesn’t look like it helps.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 个月前

      I think he’s really good at compartmentalization and it wouldn’t surprise me if deep down he does think the election was stolen from him. I also don’t think he’ll be satisfied being on the political sidelines so he’ll run as long as he’s able.

  • Don_Dickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 个月前

    No because in a video I just saw when he was speaking to a group of christians he said this is the election you need to vote in because when he is president there will be no more voting. He said this three times just to reinforce it.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      Obviously just locker room talk. People are just taking his comments about ending democracy and becoming a dictator on day one out of context. He’s speaking metaphorically.

      –“Centrists” still voting for Trump, probably

    • Sean@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 个月前

      I’d like to believe that congress would never allow him to change the constitution and subvert due process, but you just never know what might happen with this guy.

        • Sean@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 个月前

          Andrew Jackson did something similar during his own presidency, but it was the supreme court he told to fuck off.

          Essentially, he wanted to relocate all the native Americans west of the Mississippi river. Well, the native Americans did what every other American does and they sued the U.S. Government. When the court ruled in favor of the Indians, Andy Jackson basically said, “fuck you, I’m gonna do it anyways.”

  • MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    He’ll be dead by then. His father lived to 95 or something but Trump proudly admits he doesn’t exercise and he eats like shit. The best healthcare in the world can only keep a guy like that alive for so long before a lifetime of bad habits catch up to him.

    Fun fact: Trump once claimed the human body is akin to a battery, and that exercising only decreases our lifespan. I wish I was joking.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    5 个月前

    Tbh, I hope so. I think the chances of his winning decline with every cycle that is a loss. But, his ability to split a vote is retained to some extent. So:

    • if he runs as the GOP candidate again, he’s more likely to lose. If the GOP is split about it, he’s more likely to have a split vote due to another conservative candidate opting into the race on a third ticket (this may not happen, in which case, he’s just less likely to win anyway due to previous losses, increased age, etc).

    • if he isn’t the GOP candidate but still runs, he’s extremely unlikely to win but could be a crazy vote split.

    I think any sane person would not run again. Trump might, though.

    • desentizised@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      Thing is, the RNC is cleptocratically his now and will be for a while. Other than that I’d hope for similar things as most people are commenting here. It will be bonkers either way until he stops breathing and then some.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 个月前

      His views on exercise are indeed bizarre. Apparently the moron thinks all humans have a finite amount of energy like a battery, which is why he never exercises.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 个月前

    I’m far more concerned about the rise of Nazism and Monarchism in the USA. Even if we never have a Republican in any governing office again and the country continues to move further and further left, America has a lot of work to do to ensure these forms of tyrrany are never even considered as a viable alternative to Democracy.

    The fact that these forms of governance survive in the hearts and minds of people is an indicator of a larger and more complex societal failing that spans the entire history of America. This is not some strange short term flash in the pan of Nazism and Authoritarianism, it is an insidious and vile tradition passed down from generation to generation, and we have only staunched it’s slow cancerous growth by publicly shaming those who voice these views publicly. Obviously this has proven ineffective.

    I think a more important question than whether one particularly sad excuse for a sad sack of shit may run for president again, is how do we make sure the Trump dynasty, and all dynasties, fade into obscurity until the last remnants of their legacy is a footnote that indicates we lived in a time period when humans, due to many generations of hoisting up those with the most lust for power into positions of power, nearly destroyed themselves. How do we make that happen?

    • viscacha@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 个月前

      Facism - and that is what Trumpism ultimately is - has always been fuelled by declining social security and rising social inequality. This provides the matrix for an ideology of us vs. them that is ultimately a distribution battle in a declining economy. Unless the USA (as well as many other nations esp. in Europe) solves this issue sufficiently well for the people at large, I see little hope for Trump or any of his clones to disappear from the political stage. That is also why the right is so eager to frame any initiative that aims to mitigate social precariousness as radical left/communism/socialism.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    5 个月前

    Doubt it, his decline in the last 8 years have been incredible. If he were a family member we would have been looking for professional help a long time ago.

    Can’t imagine he’d be able to remain aware of his surroundings in 2 more years

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 个月前

    I think if he loses in 24 and the republicans don’t learn their lesson, then they deserve to have him run again in 28.

    Also, he’s very old. He would be 82 in 2028.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        No. They are susceptible to be influenced and manipulated by populist ideas. If it isn’t Trump someone else will do the same with them.

          • ben_dover@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 个月前

            true, but i think the comment aims more at “it doesn’t have to be this specific con man, they’d fall for other con men too just the same way”

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 个月前

              I think the counterpoint is that it seems not that common for one and only one con man to milk this voting base. Trump seems to be special in that he has nearly a monopoly, where as others would probably be in stronger competition and stuck splitting the populace.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 个月前

              My point is that anyone can be conned by the right con man. Our status as Trump opposers does not render us immune to malicious deceit.

              I don’t mean to excuse the trumpists entirely. I’m just pointing out that without Trump to focus them, they don’t become radicalized, and never become a problem.

              • aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 个月前

                Trump voters are the victim of a con, but the con is bigger than Trump. Conservatism in general is a con that needs misinformation networks like talk radio, fox news, facebook groups, etc. Without having been steeped in that bullshit for 40+ years, Trump would never have succeeded. It’s the whole ecosystem that’s doing the radicalization, not just Trump.